# Active TS, Being put in for an SCI, does this mean re-investigation?

**URL:** <https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/active-ts-being-put-in-for-an-sci-does-this-mean-re-investigation/8017>\
**Category:** SECURITY CLEARANCE Q&A\
**Created:** [August 15, 2019, 2:01pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/active-ts-being-put-in-for-an-sci-does-this-mean-re-investigation/8017 "2019-08-15T14:01:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ATSP](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c2a13f/32.png) [@ATSP](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/u/ATSP)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2019, 2:01pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/active-ts-being-put-in-for-an-sci-does-this-mean-re-investigation/8017/1 "2019-08-15T14:01:04Z")

</div>

My TS was adjudicated in the middle of 2018, and worked at 2 places after (one full time and one contractor) and then I started my current job full-time with a company supporting the NGA (National Geo-spatial Intelligence Agency) and it requires an SCI with a CI poly. Since my TS is active and was adjudicated last year, does this mean I will be re-investiagted? I understand the SCI is not a clearance and is just a determination of need (my SSBI said I was SCI eligible). But does this mean that they’ll go and interview my supervisors from my last two positions? Or re-investigate me from scratch?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anon1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e47774/32.png) [@Anon1](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/u/Anon1)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2019, 2:13pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/active-ts-being-put-in-for-an-sci-does-this-mean-re-investigation/8017/2 "2019-08-15T14:13:46Z")

</div>

No you won’t be reinvestigated.  
You’ll be put in for a CI poly (which you need to pass) then you can get indoc’ed (indoctrinated) by the government agency into the relevant SCI compartments.