# Clearance Applicant with a Full House of Issues

**URL:** <https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/clearance-applicant-with-a-full-house-of-issues/13603>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [September 7, 2021, 1:44pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/clearance-applicant-with-a-full-house-of-issues/13603 "2021-09-07T13:44:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marko](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/marko/32/103_2.png) [@Marko](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/u/Marko)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2021, 1:44pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/clearance-applicant-with-a-full-house-of-issues/13603/1 "2021-09-07T13:44:41Z")

</div>

Originally published at: [https://www.clearancejobsblog.com/clearance-applicant-with-a-full-house-of-issues/](https://www.clearancejobsblog.com/clearance-applicant-with-a-full-house-of-issues/)  
   
Usually, security clearance applicants who are denied eligibility for access to classified information have one or two disqualifying factors that cannot be mitigated. Well, a recent Department of Energy (DOE) contractor takes the cake, hitting over half of the thirteen national security adjudicative guidelines. Here are the highlights from&nbsp;his appeal&nbsp;to the DOE Office of Hearing…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sbusquirrel](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/sbusquirrel/32/34_2.png) [@sbusquirrel](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/u/sbusquirrel)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2021, 9:14pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/clearance-applicant-with-a-full-house-of-issues/13603/2 "2021-09-07T21:14:15Z")

</div>

“Generally poor decision-making.”

To put it mildly.