# DoD Underreporting Adverse Information is an Issue

**URL:** <https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/dod-underreporting-adverse-information-is-an-issue/10016>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [February 10, 2020, 3:30pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/dod-underreporting-adverse-information-is-an-issue/10016 "2020-02-10T15:30:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marko](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/marko/32/103_2.png) [@Marko](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/u/Marko)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2020, 3:30pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/dod-underreporting-adverse-information-is-an-issue/10016/1 "2020-02-10T15:30:48Z")

</div>

Originally published at: [https://www.clearancejobsblog.com/dod-underreporting-adverse-information-is-an-issue/](https://www.clearancejobsblog.com/dod-underreporting-adverse-information-is-an-issue/)  
   
In the security clearance world we all know reporting adverse information or suspicious behavior for clearance holders is a requirement, but does it happen? Based on my own experience I would say the odds are 50-50 depending on who is involved and the potential impact. A recent study conducted by the Defense Personnel and Security…