# Living With Illegal Alien Results in Clearance Denial

**URL:** <https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/living-with-illegal-alien-results-in-clearance-denial/976>\
**Category:** SECURITY CLEARANCE NEWS\
**Created:** [January 31, 2017, 3:05am UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/living-with-illegal-alien-results-in-clearance-denial/976 "2017-01-31T03:05:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![billlove74](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a587f6/32.png) [@billlove74](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/u/billlove74)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2017, 5:44pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/living-with-illegal-alien-results-in-clearance-denial/976/2 "2017-01-31T17:44:29Z")

</div>

I agree with DOHA’s decision, but I do not believe that “the current political climate” had anything to do with it and the Director of DOHA would absolutely disagree with that contention. DOHA and **ALL** DoD adjudicators are trained and practice implementation of the adjudicative guidelines. Political climate and other distractions, such as lawyers, Congressmen, General Officers, etc, should not be influencing eligibility determinations. I also disagree with the idea that the subject “has not broken the law” when he has, in fact, been harboring a criminal therefore he is an accessory to a crime. I would love to read the PSI, especially the personal interview to know what he knew and when. Denial was the appropriate decision.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/living-with-illegal-alien-results-in-clearance-denial/976)._