# Military Base Access / DBIDS Waiver Review Timeline & Manual Adjudication Insights

**URL:** <https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/military-base-access-dbids-waiver-review-timeline-manual-adjudication-insights/22222>\
**Category:** SECURITY CLEARANCE Q&A\
**Created:** [September 29, 2026, 11:18pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/military-base-access-dbids-waiver-review-timeline-manual-adjudication-insights/22222 "2026-09-29T23:18:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![waterdk](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/22d042/32.png) [@waterdk](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/u/waterdk)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2026, 11:18pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/military-base-access-dbids-waiver-review-timeline-manual-adjudication-insights/22222/1 "2026-09-29T23:18:36Z")

</div>

Hello everyone,

I am looking for insights or similar experiences regarding a physical military base gate access appeal (DBIDS) currently under review at the Garrison Command/DES level. It has been pending for over two weeks.

**Context & Background:**

- **Position:** PhD Contractor Scientist supporting a defense contract for a Navy technical mission.

- **The Flag:** Initial gate access was flagged/denied during the NCIC scan due to an active civil restraint flag associated with a misdemeanor pretrial matter (4th-degree sexual contact / 2nd-degree assault).

- **Legal Disposition:** Both charges were resolved as **Probation Before Judgment (PBJ)** in Maryland, which is legally a non-conviction.

- **Mitigation & Recent Status:** It has been 2.5 years since the disposition with a completely clean record since. My sponsor recently checked directly with the security office, and they confirmed that **no additional documents or information are currently requested** on my end.

**Questions for Adjudicators / Experienced Contractors:**

1. Since it’s sitting quietly past the initial automated stage for over two weeks without a rejection or a request for more info, how is this type of manual review typically interpreted?

2. Are adjudicators deep-diving into the mitigation (2.5 years clean, non-conviction PBJ) and sponsor justification to potentially structure a conditional or short-term access waiver (e.g., 180-day reviewable access)?

Any advice or perspective from those familiar with base access adjudications would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marko](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/marko/32/103_2.png) [@Marko](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/u/Marko)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2026, 12:08am UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/military-base-access-dbids-waiver-review-timeline-manual-adjudication-insights/22222/2 "2026-09-30T00:08:00Z")

</div>

Two things jump out at me: you mentioned the NCIC indicated you have an active civil restraint against you. Why is it still active if you have completed all sentencing requirements?

You say the case ended up closed with a PBJ which in Maryland is a nonconviction. However. Access to a base falls under federal jurisdiction and the federal government does not recognize PBJ or adjudication withheld because technically you are on a form of probation and if you fail to meet the sentencing requirements you would be found guilty of the offense. Because of the plea it is considered a form of admittance that the conduct that led to the charges actually occurred.

The reason it is taking so long for them to decide is that it has to go to a trained adjudicator who probably would consult with legal on it.