# Question about SF-86 Question 25 **URL:** \ **Category:** SECURITY CLEARANCE Q&A\ **Created:** [May 28, 2018, 4:29pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/question-about-sf-86-question-25/3663 "2018-05-28T16:29:33Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 7\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![bishop76](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/2acd7d/32.png) [@bishop76](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/u/bishop76)\ **Post date:** [May 28, 2018, 4:29pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/question-about-sf-86-question-25/3663/1 "2018-05-28T16:29:33Z")
I submitted an SF-86 using the August 2016 version but I didn’t catch that Q25 wanted to know ALL of your investigations as opposed to the last one which I know the previous version did. My investigator brought it up. I said it was a mistake and I told him all of the re-/investigation dates as I remembered them. Am I in real trouble?? It was a COMPLETE mistake as I have no derogatory information nor debts listen in my previous SF-86s. Marko, anyone, can you weigh-in on this? ---
**Author:** ![Marko](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/marko/32/103_2.png) [@Marko](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/u/Marko)\ **Post date:** [May 28, 2018, 4:30pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/question-about-sf-86-question-25/3663/2 "2018-05-28T16:30:56Z")
It is a common mistake that will not affect your adjudication. ---
**Author:** ![bishop76](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/2acd7d/32.png) [@bishop76](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/u/bishop76)\ **Post date:** [May 28, 2018, 10:44pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/question-about-sf-86-question-25/3663/3 "2018-05-28T22:44:25Z")
Thanks Marko. Marko/All, is there a timeline for updating the BI on SF-86 concerns after the PSI? I thought I discussed my SF-86 concerns with my BI (things that were in a gray area) without the BI ever bringing it up but I don’t remember now. I thought my FSO sent my concerns via email but when I followed up with the BI didn’t have them/it. Not trying to hide anything but I don’t want to be hit up with a Guideline E issue later. ---
**Author:** ![compsci36](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/compsci36/32/1380_2.png) [@compsci36](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/u/compsci36)\ **Post date:** [September 6, 2018, 9:18pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/question-about-sf-86-question-25/3663/5 "2018-09-06T21:18:54Z")
BI will note it in the report as an accidental oversight. Happens all the time. Don’t worry. I left it out on accident and was adjudicated just fine. ---
**Author:** ![backgdinvestigator](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/backgdinvestigator/32/209_2.png) [@backgdinvestigator](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/u/backgdinvestigator)\ **Post date:** [September 7, 2018, 3:38am UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/question-about-sf-86-question-25/3663/6 "2018-09-07T03:38:21Z")
This is common. Even I can’t keep track of all mine. I normally report the ones I recall, then explain I am missing many from my military service because they were very frequent. ---
**Author:** ![ForeverCoding](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/f6c823/32.png) [@ForeverCoding](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/u/ForeverCoding)\ **Post date:** [September 7, 2018, 3:42pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/question-about-sf-86-question-25/3663/7 "2018-09-07T15:42:08Z")
What is Q25? I dont know it off the top of my head ---
**Author:** ![datesnotrecalled](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/f9ae1b/32.png) [@datesnotrecalled](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/u/datesnotrecalled)\ **Post date:** [September 7, 2018, 4:42pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/question-about-sf-86-question-25/3663/8 "2018-09-07T16:42:16Z")
He means section 25 - prior investigations