# Security Clearance Continuous Evaluation Net Catches Some Bad Fish

**URL:** <https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/security-clearance-continuous-evaluation-net-catches-some-bad-fish/2242>\
**Category:** SECURITY CLEARANCE NEWS\
**Created:** [October 9, 2017, 10:30pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/security-clearance-continuous-evaluation-net-catches-some-bad-fish/2242 "2017-10-09T22:30:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marko](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex016/user_avatar/discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/marko/32/103_2.png) [@Marko](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/u/Marko)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2017, 10:30pm UTC](https://discuss.clearancejobsblog.com/t/security-clearance-continuous-evaluation-net-catches-some-bad-fish/2242/1 "2017-10-09T22:30:22Z")

</div>

Originally published at: [https://www.clearancejobsblog.com/security-clearance-continuous-evaluation-net-catches-some-bad-fish/](https://www.clearancejobsblog.com/security-clearance-continuous-evaluation-net-catches-some-bad-fish/)  
   
For a long while now security clearance reform proponents have talked about using continuous evaluation processes in lieu of 5 or 10 year reinvestigations to find and weed out those clearance holders who might be less than worthy of having access to classified information. The Defense Security Service (DSS) recently announced that it was adding…