I guess my point in contending with some of your points in all of your recent articles about CE in the last few years is you don’t speak about the things that can be missed in a clearance process because of CE. You only share your opinion that it will be better and it’s a long time coming to have CE or this is the correct process to conduct reinvestigations by CE.
But has anyone ever down a thorough analysis on what can be potentially missed by not doing in person interviews with a Subject and meticulously going through the SF-86 like we used to do asking every question, reading verbal and body language all while that person is under an Unsworn Declaration and advised of Title 18 Section 1001?
Until I see an article on this blog website that discusses the pro’s and con’s of CE and looks at the potential impacts of CE missing things that weren’t missed in the previous process, I’ll continue to have skepticism about what you are writing.
I think you are a knowledgeable individual about the clearance process and I am not trying to pick a fight but have valid and serious concerns about the background investigation process going forward within the federal government.