Previously Adjudicated Adverse Information is Still Fair Game

This actually makes a lot of sense and actually clarified my thoughts about your previous post regarding this where a few people speculated as to what previous behavior can be re-evaluated.

It’s recurrent behavior and should be revisited and considered. It’s the very reason why second chances should keep people from their first issue happening again.

The way it was phrased before people were interpreting as something that was previously adjudicated was suddenly an issue at re-evaluation. Thanks for the clarifying content.