Perhaps, I have become to dependent on Microsoft word to correct as on my phone within the blog it does not provide any corrections.
IPv6 local link is a Hugh risk just trying to warn others. To everyone with a clearance they need
to be aware as with all government contractor there are investigators and other agencies now connected to Microsoft Teams then consider what the JEDi program allows this is clear though CVR.
Someone or group has choose to abuse there position by exercising actions against others not based on a valid legal purpose.
I have worked with and seen people choose to create undo hardship on people because of perception.
In my past have worked in place that was in Development at a remote location when I was younger and getting started and there was a small group of people for a key mission system and was working with senior person there who was in late 40s and had notice the manager had been giving him a hard way to go.
Then one day there was a system that failed prior to a big event on the exact day this senior tech was off. People working the site tried to correct the problem but could not. Then the that same senior tech came out to site to fix it on his day off when the Manager called him to ask if he knew about the issue.
On the surface sounds like something good. However, I had been working with the senior tech and discovered this problem the work the week before and on the day this event happen both he and I was off work but no one called me because I was the new guy.
I reviewed the logs when both the senior tech and I were on shift about the failure that had occurred and he become very agitated.
So I let it go that day, However, I could not completely drop it when he was not around.
I looked harder and discovered that same failure he and I had worked on he did not pass on in the log to the next shift in the log reports and upon reviewing the system details he had allowed the system up to allow this to happen right before and event the next day that was occurring on his day off so he could come in on overtime hours and solved the problem knowing it would generate hours of downtime.
It took nearly 2 weeks after incident occurred to confirm these details.
Being, I was new and dependent upon him to check off my work to become certified and he was at that time one of the most qualified trainers. It placed me in a difficult position. However, the work we were doing was serving a higher purpose and the data collected was important but not critical.
He choose to risk compromising mission data and impede mission effectiveness to gain status which I did not respect or like. At that time I did not clearly understand the avenues of reporting such an event so I told myself that I would just seek to gain knowledge and seek to take his position because I would never do something to purposely gain personal status to maintain position or advance.
As I was perusing this path, the senior tech knew I understood what he did and he became more critical of me and tried to turn the manager and others against me.
Months later the manger talked to about these slights, while I knew why this occurring too much time had past to explain and prove exactly what the senior tech had did so I had to just take it and move forward if I was to stay there.
While I did all I could as I became seasoned to ensure new people coming in would not choose to become like the senior tech.
I did notice the manager was fast to become critical of senior tech over time which was what I now believe was likely because of age related bias.
However, the Manager had often had challenges maintaining good people in this remote position and unless I was willing to commit to something long term there it would have been difficult for him to side with me even I provided details of what occurred.
After about 2 years I left however, I made a promise to myself that as I become older would not allow myself to ever compromise my moral compass no matter what undo bias I may encounter.
Because the missions I have supported are all to important to allow any unnatural delay and they serve a higher cause. I will always just seek to improve myself and gain value though what I can give and contribute even if I face unjust treatment.
However, in areas that really matter no matter what it cost me even a job if I see something that is going on no matter what influence that person has. I will do all I can to stop them from having the same impact on others.
I have can honestly say over the years I have followed up with this and at times it has came at great cost.
I have discovered many times its because people may themselves have experienced undo bias due
to ageism or other. Sometimes, hurt people will hurt others unless they content with what happen to them.
However, when all facts and details are brought into the light about a particular event, their actions were inappropriate and there are key process for a reason and at times it may allow those who are actually doing wrong to get a pass, at the same time these same processes can protect people from unjustly actions.
Contrary, to cancel cultural perception is not reality.
As in what happen to me above to the Manager and new people I appeared to be doing certain things wrong due to bias placed on me by the senior tech and this allowed him to create and try and only train people that may be willing to make the same comprises he would.
The culture was corrupted as the manager appeared overly biased against the senior tech and he choose to try and control though training and comprising mission systems to do what he did.
The details always matter and on conclusions, I generally apply the test of 3 to matters of ambiguity.
As I have learned though principles of science.
In the end the reason for explaining all this is because someone or group within access to government resources made a decision to exercise there own values based upon assumptions that compromise mission effectiveness by hacking my computer right at the exact time I started in processing for a position of importance for nearly 2 months without end this caused a loss in mission productivity and damage to myself and those who depend on me.
If they are allowed to continue they will become more embolden just as the senior tech did while he had valid driving factors just as whatever goverment agency who did this to me may have the impact created has a far larger circle and cannot be allowed to continue.