Hello, I am in the process of being interview process to get clearance for a Federal Agency. While the initial process of applying through their website I did not see any behavior or activity that would disqualify me for the position. However as I am about to go in for the interview part of the documentation I was filling out that was not in the initial scan was on conduct.
Now the only conduct I am worried I have visited and paid an Escort and obviously I know that is something that they will not like. And I fully plan on being honest about it. I’m sure it’ll come up in my background check after they look through my financial records and communications, and I understand it’s important to disclose this to ensure there is no potential blackmail in the future.
The only true mitigation factor I can think of is that I was not in a relationship at the time, and therefore that doesn’t show behavior that could flag me as vulnerable to that in the future. This truly is the only thing that could flag me as I have a clear record beyond that.
That being said I know this activity is frowned upon and I wanted to ask, without naming the specific branch of federal law enforcement, will this disqualify me from out of the gate? If so should I simply withdraw my application now and save them and myself some time? Or is there still potential. Any thoughts or this would be appreciated as I need to get myself scheduled soon.
I mean, the website, and everything that I met her through was an escort website, and there was nothing specifically explicit through the ad or our conversations we had over the phone. So this wasn’t just some woman off the street.
However, will a review board or the organization make a distinction here? Objectively I contacted a woman, we spent time together and then I compensated her for her time. I mean, there’s not one thing that could be proven that happened of an explicit nature.
That being said, I don’t think it will look good to anyone when they’re considering giving them clearance, because if anything happened or not, it doesn’t really matter it’s more of just the appearance of it all. And again, I am willing to disclose this, but I’m just concerned that I might be wasting their time if this is enough to be considered disqualifying behavior.
If you paid a woman for sexual activity anywhere other than Nevada, you broke the law and you should disclose it. If you paid a woman to pretend she is your hot girlfriend at your class reunion, and no money was exchanged for sex, then you didn’t break the law and no reason to bring it up unless someone could blackmail you over the activity. And to be clear, this won’t be revealed by the government looking at your finances or communications— the real world doesn’t work like an episode of NCIS.
Thank you for your response and I very much appreciate it. That is a very rational response but if you don’t think they pull financial records and find donations of money like that suspicious? Or you don’t think they would assume poor conduct if they did look into it? And in your opinion either way, would that be considered disqualifying? I’d just like to know before I go in to ensure I am not wasting their time if that’s going to be the case.
The SF-86 and the clearance investigation only asks about crimes you are charged and/or convicted of. There is no need to disclose this info unless you are asked about having committed a crime that you weren’t charged/convicted of or about prostitution. If you’re getting a full scope polygraph they will ask and you can disclose it then. Basically, don’t lie if asked but don’t offer it up freely if not. I disclosed prostitution in my poly and passed.
Well, not something I relish, I am more than willing to do that if it’s genuinely required to avoid blackmail, I understand how seriously these things are taken, and I would never let myself be compromised over a little social embarrassment, especially because it’s not like I was unfaithful to a partner or anything anyways.
Thank you for the thoughtful and longer response, I very much appreciate that. My only question here is that this isn’t even for the SF-86, this is onboarding for the position I applied to. While I have not been asked in the first few rounds of parts of my application. I was directly asked on a form for this federal law enforcement agency on if and when I engaged in certain behavior is on the list. So while not to the polygraph quite yet which I would disclose to them I am earlier along in this process. I understand lying during this process is means for no longer being considered for the position anyways, and as I said in another post I’m sure when they do the financial background check and look at communications it’ll be noticed. So I guess my question to you, is given your experience would you consider the act in itself as disqualifying? If so I can with draw my application in order to save them time.
Honestly every case is individual and there’s usually no way to tell without just going through the process. I will say that law enforcement agencies are (understandably) less forgiving around criminal activities. Again, just be honest, don’t overshare, and see where the process takes you. If they deny you based on suitability that will not affect your clearance chances elsewhere.
He paid for their “time together”. The sex was “unrelated”. He should be disqualified just for being so cagey about the issue.
If asked, the investigator wants to hear “I paid for an escort service x years ago. We had sex. I never saw her again and will never pay for an escort again.”
It won’t permanently disqualify you, but it can be disqualifying if recently and frequently. The SF-86 does not even ask this question. You would only be required to disclose this information if you were arrested/convicted of paying for sex. If you are getting up to a TS/SCI, then there will be no polygraph. Even if there is a polygraph, it would only be asked on Fullscope polygraph and not a CI and only certain agencies give polygraph. You do not have to admit or volunteer any information that you are not asked.
What’s they gonna ask? You had sex with prostitute? Or if he done something can be blackmailed?if he legit felt its one off and not blackmailble he can just say no?
If you filmed it and you had sex but you paid her, you paid her to make a pornographic movie, which in most instances is legal and not considered prostitution.
One of the questions on the FSP is along the lines of “have you ever committed a serious crime?” And they go over what they consider a serious crime beforehand. Prostitution is on that list so yes they ask about it, just not directly.