I have a question. For TS clearance, I am curious about the situation if a person passes (for lack of a better word) the background investigation but does not pass the polygraph (inconclusive or deception).
Can a clearance be denied solely on the polygraph results? Or would the agency just send one of those vague rejections based on suitability?
This is one of those questions that gets into semantics/jargon/babblespeak.
The investigation completes, good or bad. The standard for completing the background investigation has to do with the report itself and not the nature of the information contained therein. That is, is all the necessary information there, have all the follow-up questions been answered, is the report properly formatted, etc etc etc.
For situations where the clearance requires the polygraph as well, it is just another datapoint. Iâve read on here where people can have an âinconclusiveâ poly and still be granted a clearance. In my experience (a couple inches wide but many years deep), the only similar situation Iâve encountered was when people who were already cleared and did not attain a âsuccessfulâ poly were allowed to retain their clearance. Sometimes they didnât even get asked to do another poly.
(I hope that last sentence makes sense, I tried to write it a couple different ways)
I donât know if youâd be denied outright (and possibly entitled to appeal) or if it would be like you say, the âsuitabilityâ rejection.
I take it that based on your experience, a first time clearance is unlikely with an inconclusive polygraph? Both of mine were inconclusive. I was explicitly told on the first one, and it was more or less implied on the second.
I am still processing for an agency in which I had 2 inconclusive polygraphs. I have been processing for a good 17 months after my polygraphs. I have a feeling that if that was an issue, then it would have already been addressed. I wouldnât worry about it.