Hi, folks.
I have seen some articles that point to a rare possibility when it comes to the outcomes of SSBIs (other than successful adjudication or an SOR). Presumably, some three letter agencies have the option of discontinuing their processing at any time based on their own suitability guidelines, which may be somewhat more demanding than the good old 13 “commandments” being used elsewhere. Does that mean that, in theory, some individuals may not necessarily have their clearances denied per se, but still would not be getting an FJO ?
I am just trying to understand if there are in fact cases where after 6+ months an applicant just sort of gets dropped out consideration and essentially walks away?
Let’s imagine a more concrete example. Suppose an applicant goes through an extensive processing, security interview, psych, poly, the whole shebang, and although they’re being upfront and highly cooperative, they fail poly nonetheless. Not so much due to a bona fide lie/concealment, but more so due to the gray area that exists thanks to some ambiguity when it comes to legality status of marijuana purchased from recreational dispensaries (state vs fed laws, yada-yada). The applicant was somewhat swayed by the examiner to do some real deep soul searching on the spot to even figure out where such inconsistency may be hidden (being susceptible to sweet talk perhaps a clandestine suitability guideline in itself? hmmm…)
Eventually the applicant is told that most likely they will be asked to retake poly, but being that it is Friday there are no options to schedule it for next day and so someone will reach out to schedule a repeat in 1-4 weeks.
Several months go by and no retake has been scheduled. Eventually the applicant is starting to think that because of how seemingly minor those inconsistencies were, they will be adjudicated anyway, because the applicant is no knucklehead and their overall profile was actually quite good - no debt, credit score well over 800, no criminal history, no DUIs or mental issues, consistent employment record for over a decade without any security incidents, but above all, a fantastic, highly sought after skillset.
Finally an email arrives stating that the processing has been discontinued. The tone of the email is deliberately cryptic and vague, but in the end the applicant may reapply in one year if they are so inclined. All of this sounds much like a clearance denial… Or is it? Is there a good chance that an SOR letter will eventually show up at some point in the mail? Just wondering if anyone had been in similar situation and how everything turned out in the end.